Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)

Google · Alibaba · catalog 2026-09-14

Trade-off: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper ($0.157 vs $0.178/M); Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) scores higher on intelligence (13.3 vs 13.1).

	Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)	Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Speed (tok/s)	75.4 measured	96.3 measured
Blended $/M	$0.157 derived	$0.178 derived
Intelligence index	13.1 measured	13.3 measured
TTFT (ms)	136 measured	77 measured
Context	—	—
Coding index	not measured for both
Agentic index	not measured for both

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) card · Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) card · 3D observatory

Verdicts use price×intelligence dominance only, and only where both sides are measured; null cells stay null with their provenance (em-dash = not in catalog). Percentile-free by design — this page compares two models, not the field. Generated page — do not hand-edit.